EducationSavvy

Whether you are an educator or a student, EducationSavvy will provide you with all the valuable information about various disciplines of education in a very simple and easy way.

Personality Theories

You will know about the famous Theories of Personality like: Psychodynamic Theory, Psychosocial Development Theory, Theory of Individual Psychology, Behavioristic Theories, Social Learning Theories, Observational Learning Theories...

Learning Theories

EducationSavvy will teach you all about the famous theories of learning like: Sensory Stimulation Theory, Reinforcement Theory, Social Learning theory, Information Processing Theory, Facilitation Theory...

Instructional Strategies

EducationSavvy will teach you about different kinds of instructional strategies and their applictions in various classrooms settings with simple examples.

Featured

Besides these, EducationSavvy will provide you with all the important and interesting information about educational research, research poroposal, thesis and desertatin, educational measurment and evaluavtion, classroom management and different types of education …

Curriculum

In education, the word curriculum has become so familiar now, that we have, almost, stop thinking about it anymore. However, in fact, very few of us know about its true nature and composition.  People use this term in different ways and styles, according to their own perception and understanding of the term. For example, some people use it in terms of content or subject matters taught in schools, while others coincide it with syllabus or course outline. Still others think it as all the experience encountered by students during an educational episode. However, all these perceptions about the curriculum are narrower in breadth and width than its real horizon, as they represent only some of the aspects of curriculum, while its actual ingredients are too many in numbers to be exactly enumerated. Usually, curriculum developers ponder upon the following four basic questions when they develop a curriculum.
  1. Why to teach?
  2. What to teach?
  3. How to teach?
  4. When to teach?
The first question provide us a rational for developing a curriculum. It is about the aims, goals and objectives of education. It tell us that since the school/society/country wants to bring certain desired changes in the behaviors of their children, therefore it needs a comprehensive strategy, curriculum, for this purpose.
The second question tells us about those contents, activities and experiences, which would be used for attaining the desired educational goals and objectives.   
The third question is about those techniques and teaching methods through which these contents and experiences would be presented to the students.
While the fourth question tells us about the appropriate time for presenting these contents, activities and experience. In other words, it tells us about the right age groups of children for which the curriculum is being developed.
Historically, curriculum has its roots in the writings of Greek philosopher Plato (428-348 BCE). Plato proposed a lifelong learning plan for the citizens of his ideal Republic. This plan, curriculum, consisted of (Hare, 1989) reading, writing, counting, sports and music, military training, and the study of philosophy. Similarly, Aristotle(384-322 BCE), a pupil of Plato, in his book “Politics” proposed his own plan of education which consisted of reading, writing, physical training, music and drawing. In 335 BCE, Aristotle founded his official school “The Lyceum” in Athens. The curriculum of this school was broader than Plato’s academy. In   1651, when the Czech philosopher John Amos Comenius (Klika, 1892) opened his pansophic school in Hungary at Sarospatak, he himself created curriculum for this school and also wrote the world’s first illustrated book “Sensory World in Images” for visualized instructions. A German pedagogue Friedrich Froebel (1782-1852), was the first to introduce organized early-childhood educational method. His kindergarten curriculum was composed of self-activity, social participation, creativity and motor expression.
According to Pratt (1994 p.5), Barrow and Milburn(1990, p.84), the word curriculum is derived from a Latin verb “Currere” which means “to run”. Currere then became a noun, which meant a racing chariot, a racetrack or a runway. Similarly, John Franklin Bobbitt (1918) in his book “The Curriculum” says that curriculum, as an idea, has its root in the Latin word for race-course. The Roman Philosopher Cicero (106 -43 BCE) associated this term with curriculum vitae which means the course of one’s life. He also used it as “curricula mentis” which means the educational course of the mind.  
The first known use of the word “curriculum” appeared in the work of Petrus Ramus, a professor in the University of Paris, in 1576. According to Oxford English Dictionary, the word curriculum was first used in English in 1633. However, it was not before the nineteenth when the European universities formally began to use this term for their courses of study.
Glatthorn, A.A.(2000) described seven common types of curriculum which are usually at work in our schools. They are given as under:
  1. Recommended curriculum
    The recommended curriculum is that which is recommended by scholars and professional organizations.
  2. Written curriculum
    The written curriculum, as the term is used here, is the curriculum that appears in state and locally produced documents, such as state standards, district scope and sequence charts, district curriculum guides, teachers' planning documents, and curriculum units.
  3. Taught curriculum
    The taught curriculum is that which teachers actually deliver day by day.
  4. Supported curriculum
    The supported curriculum includes those resources that support the curriculum i.e. textbooks, software, and other media.
  5. Assessed curriculum
    The assessed curriculum is that which appears in tests and performance measures: state tests, standardized tests, district tests, and teacher-made tests.
  6. Learned curriculum
    The learned curriculum is the bottom-line curriculum i.e. the curriculum that students actually learn.
  7. Hidden curriculum
    This is the unintended curriculum. It defines what students learn from the physical environment, the policies, and the procedures of the school. Here is an example. Each week teachers in an elementary school devote 250 minutes to reading and 50 minutes to art. Students learn this lesson: "In this school, art is not considered very important."
However, in my view there are only two types of curriculum namely overt curriculum and covert curriculum. Because, learning takes place either through overt/explicit/planned curriculum or covert/implicit/hidden curriculum.
So far, many researchers have shed light on curriculum in their writings and it would be impossible, due to the lack of time and space, to list all of them. However, for better understanding and comprehension of its nature and role, it will be reasonable to quote some of them.
  1. Cunningham: “Curriculum is a tool in the hands of the artist (teacher) to mould his material (pupils) according to his ideas (aims and objectives) in his studio (school)”.
  2.  Morroe: “Curriculum includes all those activities which are utilized by the school to attain the aims of education.
  3. Caswell and Campbell describe curriculum as “All experiences children have under the guidance of teachers”.
  4. Marsh and Willis view curriculum as “An interrelated set of plans and experiences that a student undertakes under the guidance of the school”.
  5. Crow and Crow: The curriculum includes all the learners’ experience in or outside school that are included in a program which has been devised to help him developmentally, emotionally, socially, spiritually and morally”.
  6. Murray Print (1993) defined curriculum as “All of those planned learnings that students were deliberately exposed to by schools”.
  7. John Kerr defines curriculum as “All the learning which is planned and guided by school, whether it is carried on in groups or individually, inside or outside the school”.
  8. Lewis and Mid (1981) defined curriculum as” a set of intentions about opportunities for engagement of persons-to-be-educated with other persons and with things (all bearers of information, processes, techniques and values) in certain arrangements of time and space.
  9. Greene (1977) says that “Curriculum, to me, ought to be a means of providing opportunities for the seizing of a range of meanings by persons open to the world, especially today.”
  10. Saylor et al. (1981) define curriculum as a plan for providing sets of learning opportunities for persons to be educated.
  11. Curriculum is the totality of learning experiences provided to students so that they can attain general skills and knowledge at a variety of learning sites. 
Looking at the above definitions carefully, we find that curriculum generally consists of:
  1. Intended educational goals and objectives.
  2. Planned activities and experiences.
  3. Planned events and learning opportunities.
Conclusion
  1. Curriculum is a means to an end, not an end in itself.
  2. Curriculum is an official document.
  3. Curriculum is a deliberate, planned and systematic effort by a school for bringing the desired change in learners’ behavior.
  4. Without proper curriculum, we can’t achieve our educational goals.
  5. Curriculum gives us a direction towards our destination.
  6. Curriculum is a complete package of goals, means and outcomes.
  7. Curriculum operates inside, and sometimes outside, under the supervision of school.
References
Aristotle. (1995). Politics. Translated by Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bobbitt, J. F.  (1918) The Curriculum, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.


Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Corporation. Retrieved 26/12/2016 from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_curriculum
Glatthorn, Allan A. (2000)The Principal as Curriculum Leader: Shaping What Is Taught & Tested. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif : Corwin Press.
Greene, M. (1977). The Artistic-Aesthetic and Curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 284.
Hare, R. M. (1989) Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press Retrieved on 27/12/2016 from http://infed.org/mobi/plato-on-education.
Klika, J. (1892). Život i rad Ivana Amosa Komenskoga. Zagreb: Naklada Hrv.Pedagoško-književnoga zbora.
Murray, P. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design (5th ed.). Malaysia: Alien and Unwin.
Saylor et al. (1981). Curriculum Planning for better teaching and learning (4th ed.). New York, New York: Rinehart and Winston.

Horney’s Personality Theory-Feminine Psychology

Karen Horney (1885-1952) was a German psychologist. She was the first psychologist who introduced Feminine Psychology in 1922. Initially, she practiced Freud’s psychoanalytical techniques, since she was trained in the psychoanalytic doctrine, but later on, she disappointed with Freud’s methodology of psychotherapy, as it was not helpful in solving her problem. Therefore, she adopted self-analysis. She rejected Freud’s conception of penis envy (female’s envy towards a male because she has no penis while he has) and presented its counterpart, the womb envy (male’s envy towards a female because she can give birth to a child while he can’t) instead. She was of the view that Freud’s concept of penis envoy is a product of male dominated society, where woman are considered inferior to man. She believed that female consider themselves inferior to males not because they are biologically weaker than male, but because of their weaker status in the society. She don’t deny the fact that most of the women feel themselves unworthy, however, according to her, the main cause of this sense of inferiority is not their physical structure but the discriminatory behavior of male dominated society faced by them for centuries. Being disappointed by their weaker position in the society, some women may deny of their femininity and may wish for masculinity. Horney termed this situation as ‘’The flight from Womanhood’’. Her theory is a rebellion against Freud theory of personality, which, according to Horney, is, generally, male oriented. She rejected Freud’s five stages of personality development. She was of the view that there are no universal stages, which shape a child personality, but in fact, it is the social and cultural factors, which determine the blue prints of a child personality. Similarly, Parent’s behavior with their children is another determinant of a child personality. Children need the love and affection of their parents. In case, they are not properly loved and cared by their parents, they will feel themselves insecure and unsafe. Consequently, they develop hostility towards their parents, which will result in their neurotic behavior. Usually, they will repress their hostility in the following ways:

  1. If children are kept in an excessive dependent state, their feelings of helplessness will encourage. Therefore, they will not dare to show their hostility towards their parents because they need them and can’t do without them.
  2. If children are made frightened by their parent’s harsh or unreasonable behavior, they will repress their hostility because of their fear from parents.
  3. If parents are not honest in their warmth and affection, children will easily know that their parent’s love and affection is fake, but here too, they will not show their hostility because they know that something is better than nothing.
  4. Sometimes, children don’t show their hostility because they feel themselves guilty by doing so.

According to Horney, this repressed hostility will manifest itself in a form called basic anxiety, which is a starting point of the later neuroses.  To cope with this situation, children often take the following steps.

  1. They strive to get love and affection from others by hook or by crook.
  2. They will not show their resentment against the perverse behavior of other people. They think that if they don’t hurt others, they will be safe. Therefore, they will remain submissive to others all the time.
  3. At times, they will try to gain power because they think that power is the only solution of all their problems; nobody will harm them if they gain a powerful position in the society.
  4. Sometimes, they will try to keep aloof from others, not physically but psychologically. They think that by becoming independent of others, they can minimize the risk of being hurt by them. Therefore, they try to minimizing their internal needs, need of security and safety, in order to keep themselves safe against basic anxiety.

Horney says that the main purpose of these four self-protective mechanisms is to get rid of basic anxiety, but unfortunately, due to their incompatible nature, they can’t be harmonized with each other to achieve a single goal. For example, you can’t remain submissive to others while trying to attain power over them. Similarly, being withdrawn from others while trying to get their love and affection is not possible at the same time. Therefore, it should be kept in mind that practicing more than one mechanism at a time may result in further conflicts. Horney was of the view that any of these self-protective mechanisms may become a permanent part of our personality and thereby influence our later behavior. She described ten defenses against basic anxiety, which she termed neurotic needs. They are given as under:

  1. Affection and approval
  2. A dominant partner
  3. Power
  4. Exploitation
  5. Prestige
  6. Admiration
  7. Achievement or ambition
  8. Self-sufficiency
  9. Perfection
  10. Narrow limits to life

In fact, the ten neurotic needs encompass the four self-protective mechanisms against basic anxiety as under:

  1. Gaining Affection=Affection and approval 
  2. Being Submissive=Dominant partner
  3. Attaining power= power+Exploitation+Prestige+Admiration+Achievement or ambition
  4. Withdrawn=Self-sufficiency+Perfection+Narrow limits to life

Horney reformulated, in her later writings, the above list of ten neurotic needs and classified them in three different categories, which she termed as neurotic trends. These trends relates to our compulsive attitude towards the self and others. Neurotic persons are compelled to act in accordance with at least one of these trends indiscriminately all the times. The three trends lead to three different types of personality, which are given as under:

  1. Movement towards other people=Compliant personality
  2. Movement against other people=Aggressive personality
  3. Movement away from other people=The detached personality

The Compliant Personality

 Persons of compliant personality have a tendency to move toward other people and get their love, affection and approval. To get the love and affection of others, they adopt such behaviors, which make other people happy and satisfied. Compliant personality always tries to please others even at the cost of their own needs and desires. They remain subservient and submissive to others. They don’t have the courage to act against the will and thrill of others because they see themselves weaker than others.   According to Horney, compliant personality is the result of childhood repressed hostility. In fact, they want to control, exploit and manipulate others but act in the opposite way.

The Aggressive Personality

Aggressive personalities tend to move against other people. They don’t care about other’s miseries or problems. They know nothing but the satisfaction of their own needs and desires. They are always in a quest for superiority. Therefore, they attempt constantly to surpass others in every field of life and get supremacy at any cost. They have no fear of rejection or disapproval by others. Their behavior is subversive and domineering.  Their friendship and relations with others are based on selfish objectives and their own interest. As that of a compliant personality, the aim of an aggressive personality is also to combat basic anxiety.

The Detached Personality

Persons having detached personality tend to avoid others. They prefer to keep psychologically isolated from others. They neither love nor hate others. They are not interested in helping or cooperating with others. Nothing is more important to them than a complete privacy. However, to remain completely detached from others, they must have enough resources to become self-sufficient and independent of others. Therefore, they must work hard to secure and maintain their resources. Their independent nature makes them sensitive to any effort, which influence or obligate them. Like aggressive personality, detached personality also wants superiority but its way of attaining superiority is different from that of aggressive personality. Aggressive personality achieves superiority by competing with others while detached personality achieves it by not competing actively with others while aggressive personality wants it at all costs. Horney found that a conflict might arise due to the basic incompatibility of these neurotic trends. She was of the view, that the main difference between a normal and a neurotic person is that the former harmonize successfully all the three trends and adopt them according to the need and suitability of the situation while the later fails in doing so.
According to Horney, everyone of us draw an image of oneself. This self-image may be either true, based on the actual potentiality, abilities, strengths and weaknesses of a person, or false, based on the qualities/characteristics idealized by a person but not actually possessed by him/her. Horney says that a neurotic person constructs an idealized self-image of himself/herself, which is not based on reality. To realize his/her unattainable ideals he/she indulges in an activity called the ‘’ tyranny of the shoulds’’ by Horney. In this situation, he/she tries to act against his/her real nature. He/she thinks that by doing so, he/she will become a perfect person, but in spite of his/her constant attempt, he/she fails in achieving this goal.  However, he/she still clings to his/her ideals and takes the easy way out, projecting his/her own conflict onto others. Horney termed this process as externalization. She says that externalization may temporarily help the neurotic person in reducing his/her basic anxiety, but it is not a permanent solution of his/her problem, bringing the real and idealized self-images together.